You are currently browsing the thoughts on thoughts weblog archives for the day 02/09/2009.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | Oct » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
- 08/02/2012: Deaf hearing
- 05/02/2012: Failure of conscious thought suppression
- 02/02/2012: What is the preconscious?
- 30/01/2012: Are there two types of cognition?
- 27/01/2012: The new way to view cognition
- 24/01/2012: About the claustrum
- 21/01/2012: Two sides of synchrony
- 18/01/2012: Skull shape changes are not independent
- 15/01/2012: the other way around
- 12/01/2012: A look at the dogma
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Archive for 02/09/2009
Search methods
02/09/2009 by admin.
The Dana site has a good little article by Jim Schnabel on the search for neural correlates of consciousness – why it is difficult? Some of those trying and how? (here). I recommend reading the article for a simple explanation of how the experiments are done.
But there are other interesting bits. Below is a very clear description of nonconscious and conscious activity. This is the process that the researchers are trying to explore in more detail.
Essentially, they found that during nonconscious perception, activity occurred in multiple areas of the cortex, yet never became coherent—firing in sync—over large distances; this nonconscious activity also dissipated relatively quickly.
By contrast, during conscious perception the activity was able to “ignite” into much longer-term, self-reinforcing, interconnected activity across widely separated cortical areas. This coherent activity included areas of the prefrontal cortex and appeared to be concentrated in the “gamma wave” range of frequencies, which previous research has linked to attention and consciousness.
Another interesting part of the article is reference to Koch’s take on Tononi’s theory:
Among possible explanations, Koch tentatively favors the “Information Integration” theory of consciousness put forward by neuroscientist Giulio Tononi at the University of Wisconsin. Tononi proposes that consciousness is a fundamental property arising from any system that uses interdependent, information-exchanging parts. By this logic, the most powerful consciousness-generating networks of the brain would be those that integrate the largest amount of neural activity—as the results from Naccache and colleagues also suggest.
The theory implies, however, that consciousness is not limited to highly evolved animals or even to biological brains. As Koch puts it, “Whether it’s my iPhone or the flatworm C. elegans or the human brain, it would differ only in the amount of consciousness. But all would be conscious.”
Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments »